Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now

×

Discipline
Biological
Keywords
Pregnancy-Specific Glycoprotein 22
Physiological Adaptation
Knockout Mice
Pregnancy
Physiological Stress
Observation Type
Standalone
Nature
Standard Data
Submitted
Oct 17th, 2016
Published
Dec 19th, 2016
  • Abstract

    Pregnancy-specific glycoproteins are secreted by immunoglobulin superfamily members encoded by multigene families in eutherian mammals with haemochorial placentation. They are expressed predominantly in placental trophoblast and exhibit immunomodulatory, anti-platelet, and pro-angiogenic functions. An inversion of Psg22 in the mouse locus is associated with relatively high Psg22 expression in the first half of the pregnancy. Bioinformatic analyses of 17 mouse strains indicated that Psg22 inversion arose at least 1.7 MYA. We used CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis to generate Psg22-null mutants, two of which were analysed in detail (Psg22Δ10and Psg22Δ16). Both mutants contain frame-shifting deletions in exon 2, resulting in premature stop codons, and Psg22 mRNA was virtually undetectable. Both mutants are fertile and there was no distortion of Mendelian ratios in heterozygous crosses. Housing of pregnant females in a hypoxic (11% O2) environment for 5 (E5–E10) or 10 (E5–E15) days did not induce differential growth or survival of Psg22 wildtype and null mutant genotypes. Our results indicate that Psg22 is dispensable for embryonic development and reproduction under laboratory conditions. As PSGs are secreted into maternal blood, future work will focus on whether Psg22 deficiency alters maternal physiology.

  • Figure
  • Introduction

    Pregnancy-specific glycoproteins (PSG) are abundantly secreted by placental trophoblast into the maternal bloodstream during human pregnancy, and their deregulation is implicated in gestational disease. PSGs aremembers of the immunoglobulin superfamily and are closely related to the predominantly membrane-anchored carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAM). PSGs are encoded by 17 genes in the mouse and 11 in the humanPSG gene families are rapidly evolving and PSG protein domain organisation differs between the mouse and human, with no discernible orthologous relationships. However, PSG functions appear to be conserved with evidence of roles in immune regulation, TGFβ1 activation, platelet regulation, and angiogenesis. Therefore, mouse Psg gene mutants may provide models of human gestational disease. PSG mRNA in the first half of mouse pregnancy is almost exclusively derived from Psg22 in trophoblast giant cells (TGC), which may be due toinversion of the Psg22 gene and duplication of a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) within the Psg locus. This expression pattern facilitates ablation of mouse Psg expression at this developmental stage without having to delete multiple Psg genes.

  • Objective

    We used CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to produce and characterise mouse Psg22-null mutants. We examined offspring genotype ratios at birth in normal pregnancy and in pregnancy with hypoxic stress, and we analysed placental weights and structure at E17 of gestation.

  • Results & Discussion

    To determine whether inversion of Psg22 relative to flanking Psg genes is a recent event confined to a limited number of laboratory strains, or an older variant that may predate divergence of major mouse strains and indeed species, we surveyed the Mouse Genomes ProjectPsg locus genomic sequences of 17 mouse strains were analysed by sequence similarity searches, genomic location, and alignment. We found Psg22 inversion in 16 of 17 mouse strains analysed (129SI_SvlmJ, AJ, AKR_J, Balb_cJ, C3H_HeJ, C57BL_6NJ, Cast_EiJ, CBA_J, DBA_2J, FVB_NJ, LP_J, NOD_ShiLtJ, NZO_HlLtJ, PWK_PhJ, Spretus_EiJ, WSB_EiJ), including the most early diverging M. spretus; the Psg22 transcript could not be clearly identified in the M. caroli/EiJ strain due to poor sequence quality. This phylogenetic distribution most likely indicates an inversion of Psg22 at least 1.7 million years ago that has been maintained in the mouse clade. Therefore, this inversion may underpin a placenta phenotype or influence fetal growth or survival.

    We have produced Psg22-null mutant mouse strains by pronuclear microinjection of fertilised oocytes with a CRISPR-Cas9 pX458 vector targeting a site in the Psg22 open reading frame (ORF) in the exon 2 (Fig. 1A), which was previously tested for activity in the NIH-3T3 embryonic fibroblast cell line (data not shown). 72 microinjected B6D2F2 zygotes were transferred to oviducts of 3 CD1 pseudopregnant female recipients, and 25 offsprings were ear-clipped for identification and DNA extraction. PCR genotyping was performed using Psg22 gene-specific primers flanking the CRISPR target site, followed by Cel I assay and direct sequencing of Cel I assay-positive PCR products. 8 progeny had mutations, and BLAST alignment indicated that 5 were genetic mosaics, 2 had deletions of 10 and 16 bp, respectively, and 1 had a 16 bp deletion just 3′ of a 1 bp substitution.

    We selected 2 mutant founders for breeding: one with a 10 bp deletion (Psg22Δ10) and one exhibiting a 16 bp deletion 3' of a 1 bp substitution (Psg22Δ16) (Fig. 1B). Both mutations are predicted to cause a frameshift resulting in a premature stop codon and were associated with greatly reduced mRNA levels (Fig. 1C), possibly due to nonsense-mediated decay.

    Both founders were backcrossed to the C57BL/6 strain for two generations (to give an average of 87.5% C57BL/6 background) before intercrossing heterozygous male and female littermates of the Psg22Δ10 and Psg22Δ16 strains to determine genotype transmission ratios. Combining the data from the two Psg22-mutant strains, there were 115 offsprings: 28 homozygous wildtype, 30 homozygous null, and 57 heterozygotes, consistent with Mendelian expectations, and suggesting that Psg22 is not essential for the development (individual strain data and the statistics are given in figure 1D). Subsequent breeding of the Psg22Δ10/Δ10 and Psg22Δ16/Δ16 homozygotes confirmed that these genotypes are fertile (data not shown). This suggests that Psg22 is dispensable for fertility and reproduction under laboratory conditions.

    Previous reports indicate that reproductive phenotypes may be elicited by applying stressors such as hypoxia to pregnancy in mouse strains with the mutations of placenta-expressed genes. We intercrossed heterozygous male and female littermates of the Psg22Δ10 and Psg22Δ16 strains as described above and, using environmental chambers, applied hypoxic stress (11% O2) to pregnant females for either 5 days (E5–E10) or 10 days (E5–E15). At E17 or E18, pregnant [females were sacrificed and embryos were genotyped and corresponding placentas were fixed, weighed, and analysed using stereological techniques. Similar to unstressed pregnancies, there was no deviation from expected Mendelian ratios (Fig. 1D), and there was no difference in placental weight and anatomy among the genotypes (Fig. 1E and F), indicating that Psg22 expression is dispensable for successful pregnancy under hypoxic conditions.

  • Conclusions

    We show that the inverted orientation of the Psg22 gene relative to flanking Psg genes is conserved in multiple mouse strains, suggesting that it originated at least 1.7 million years ago. Unlike the Prolactin family gene PLP-APsg22-null mutants are viable under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions of pregnancy, with no distortion of Mendelian ratios in heterozygous crosses and no detectable placental phenotype.

  • Limitations

    We did not analyse Psg22 protein expression in our Psg22 mutants due to lack of a validated anti-Psg22-specific antibody. However, this deficit is offset by our finding of very low levels of Psg22 mRNA in the mutants. We did not analyse maternal gestational physiology in Psg22 mutant strains. However, unlike human PSGs that are present at high levels in maternal blood, mouse PSGs appear to be rapidly degraded in the maternal bloodstream and do not exhibit significant steady-state levels, suggesting that a significant effect on maternal physiology may be unlikely.

  • Alt. Explanations

    The Psg22 gene inversion may explain its high expression in trophoblast giant cells (TGCs) in the first half of pregnancy relative to other Psg genes. However, the overall level of Psg expression in TGC is substantially lower than in spongiotrophoblast in the second half of pregnancy. It is possible that the Psg22 inversion evolved by genetic drift, or due to a linked beneficial genetic variant, and does not encode a detectable phenotype. It will be necessary to delete the entire Psg locus, comprising 17 Psg genes, to determine whether there is redundancy among family members and whether complete ablation of Psg expression has an observable effect on fetal and placental development and maternal gestational physiology.

  • Conjectures

    PSG gene families may have evolved due to maternal-fetal conflict, and a prediction of this theory is that high expression levels of conflictor genes may result from mutually antagonistic interactions, but with a small net effect on phenotype. A corollary is that, notwithstanding high expression, deletion of the entire Psg locus may not result in a significant mutant phenotype. This argument is supported by the observation of high Psg mRNA expression in the placental trophoblast with rapid turnover of Psg protein in the maternal circulation. Therefore, a more informative experiment may be to overexpress the Psg proteins in transgenic mouse models under the hypothesis that excess Psg protein may swamp maternal mechanisms for removing Psg from the circulation.

  • Methods

    Bioinformatics

    A dataset of 17 mouse strains was assembled from the Sanger Institute website (ftp://ftp-mouse.sanger.ac.uk/REL-1504-Assembly), as follows: 129SI_SvlmJ, AJ, AKR_J, Balb_cJ, C3H_HeJ, C57BL_6NJ, Cast_EiJ, Caroli_EiJ, CBA_J, DBA_2J, FVB_NJ, LP_J, NOD_ShiLtJ, NZO_HlLtJ, PWK_PhJ, Spretus_EiJ, WSB_EiJ. The region known to contain the Psg cluster, i.e. region 15,000,000–22,000,000 on chromosome 7, was extracted from all mouse strains from the whole-genome file using a custom Bash script. Psg gene sequences were obtained from Ensembl for the mouse reference strain C57BL/6J, and these were used as the query sequences in the subsequent sequence similarity searches. Nucleotide BLAST was used to obtain Psg gene sequences from all mouse strains using the annotated Psg sequences from C57BL/6J. Coordinates from the BLAST search allowed localisation of the queried Psg genes on either leading or lagging strand in the different strains.

    CRIPSR-Cas9 vector cloning and validation

    Psg22 targeting oligonucleotides were selected using CHOPCHOP (https://chopchop.rc.fas.harvard.edu) and were chosen from exon 2 of the Psg22 to disrupt the ORF. Oligonucleotides (Eurofins MWG Operon, Eberberg, Germany) were cloned into px458 CRISPR vectors (www.addgene.org) using Zhang laboratory protocol (www.genome-engineering.org/crispr/). The px458-Psg22 vector was tested in the NIH-3T3 cell line using transient transfection with 3 µL Turbofect transfection reagent. 72 h post-transfection, cells were harvested and genomic DNA was extracted using QIAGEN DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit. 10 ng DNA was used as template for PCR reaction using Psg22 specific primers spanning the CRISPR target site; the resulting PCR products were analysed for successful genome editing using Surveyor nuclease Cel I assay kit (Integrated DNA Technologies, www.idtdna.com).

    Psg22 -mutant mouse production

    Male parental B6D2F1 mice and female B6D2F1 zygote donor mice were obtained from DBA/2 and C57BL/6J breeding pairs. B6D2F1 females were superovulated at 6–10 weeks of age by intraperitoneal injection of 5 IU pregnant mare’s serum gonadotropin (PMSG) and 5 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 48 h apart. Directly after hCG injection, the superovulated females were mated to B6D2F1 males. CD1 pseudopregnant females were set up in the afternoon of day 1 by mating with vasectomised CD1 males. The following morning (day 0.5 postcoitum; embryonic day 1, E1), B6D2F1 zygotes were harvested and placed in M16 drops in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. The vector px458-Psg22 was diluted to 5 ng/µL in microinjection buffer (8 mM Tris-HCl, 0.15 mM EDTA). Pronuclear microinjection was carried out in a drop of M2 medium under mineral oil. The same day, 72 microinjected zygotes were surgically transferred into the oviducts of 3 CD1 pseudopregnant females. Each CD1 female was bilaterally transferred with 24 microinjected zygotes. 25 weaned offsprings were ear-clipped and genotyped. Genotyping primers were designed using Primer-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) to amplify a 606-bp Psg22- specific product spanning the CRISPR-Cas9 target site. Genotyping primers were Psg22-2F 5′-CAGAAACAACACCATGTGAGT-3′ and Psg22-2R 5′-AGACACAATGCAGAGGGAAATA-3′. PCR products were purified (QIAGEN PCR purification kit) and directly sequenced (GATC, Koln, Germany).

    Hypoxia treatment of pregnant mice

    Commencing at E5 of pregnancy, female mice were housed in standard cages placed in commercial environmental chambers with precise control of ambient oxygen concentration (Oxycycler, Biospherix, NY) which was maintained at 11% balance nitrogen for 5 or 10 consecutive days (until E10 or E15, respectively). On removal from hypoxia, mice were housed under normal husbandry conditions in room air until E17 or E18.

    Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

    First-strand cDNA was synthesised using 1 µg total RNA in a 20 µL reaction using random hexamer priming and the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, UK). Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) primers were designed to give unbiased amplification of Psg22 transcripts: Psg22-QRT-F 5′-CGCATGGCCAGTTGGCCATT-3′ and Psg22-QRT-R 5′-AAAGCGGGGGAAATAGTTGTAGTA-3′. Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (Hprt) expression was used to normalise mRNA input and cDNA synthesis efficiency using primers: Hprt-F: 5’-CTATAAGTTCTTTGCTGACCTGCT-3’; Hprt-R: 5’-ATCATCTCCACCAATAACTTTTATGT-3’. qRT-PCR was carried out in triplicated 20 µL reactions using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, UK), 1 µL cDNA, and primers at 600 mM using the ABI PRISM 7900HT instrument. PCR cycle was initial denaturation (95°C for 10 min), amplification and quantification repeated for 40 cycles (95°C for 45 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s with a single continuous fluorescence measurement), followed by a melting curve program (60–95°C, with a heating rate of 1°C per 30 s and a continuous fluorescence measurement). Mouse E15 placental cDNA was used to produce the standard curve. PCR products were identified by generating a melt curve, and results were expressed as mean Psg22 expression relative to mean Hprt expression.

    Histology

    Placental weights were measured after fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (in phosphate buffered saline at pH 7.4). Samples were then dehydrated and embedded in paraffin wax. 5 mm thick sections were cut on a Leica RM2125RT microtome and stained with hematoxylin/eosin and viewed using an adapted Zeiss Jena Microfilm Reader fitted with a 17.5x projector lens. Simple point counting methods were used to estimate the volume fraction of spongiotrophoblast and the labyrinthine trophoblast compartments .

    Statistical analyses were implemented in Microsoft Excel.

  • Funding statement

    The work was supported by a Higher Education Authority infrastructure grant (PRTLI5/Irish Transgenic Network) to T.M. and V.K.

  • Acknowledgements

    pSpCas9(BB)-2A-GFP (PX458) was a gift from Feng Zhang (Addgene plasmid # 48138).

  • Ethics statement

    Mouse procedures were conducted at UCC and TCD following institutional ethical review and under HPRA authorisations B100/3801 and B100/4429 (https://www.hpra.ie/homepage/veterinary/scientific-animal-protection).

  • References
  • 1
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
    2
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
    3
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
    4
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
    5
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
    Matters10.5/20

    Psg22-null mouse embryos develop normally under normoxic and hypoxic conditions of pregnancy

    Affiliation listing not available.
    John M Williams
    School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork
    Tania Bezak
    School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin
    Mrinmoy Das
    School of Microbiology, University College Cork
    Zhenfei Ning
    School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork
    Eric F Lucking
    Department of Physiology, University College Cork
    Vincent P Kelly
    School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin
    Patrick Harrison
    Department of Physiology, University College Cork
    Paul Young
    School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork
    Mary J O'Connell
    School of Biology, University of Leeds
    Peter Dockery
    Department of Anatomy, National University of Ireland Galway
    Ken D O'Halloran
    Department of Physiology, University College Cork
    Tom Moore
    C

    School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork

    [email protected]