Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now


Human African Trypanosomiasis
Trypanosoma Brucei
Observation Type
Negative data
Jun 20th, 2018
Aug 14th, 2018
  • Abstract

    African sleeping sickness is a tropical disease caused by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense or T. b. rhodesiense. Both subspecies are transmitted by the tsetse fly. In general, an infection is lethal without an effective treatment. We used a rodent efficacy model to test 4 compounds that had been previously identified in a novel in vitro screen as activators of parasite differentiation from bloodstream towards procyclic forms. The 4 compounds were trypanocidal in vitro. However, none of the compounds showed trypanocidal activity in vivo. Snapshot pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles indicated that the compound exposure was too low after intraperitoneal administration, which explains the lack of efficacy.

  • Figure
  • Introduction

    Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), also known as sleeping sickness, is a disease caused by 2 subspecies of T. brucei in sub-Saharan Africa. There is no vaccine available, and it is highly unlikely that one will be developed owing to frequent alterations of the parasites’ variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) coat, a phenomenon known as antigenic variation. The few drugs that are available to treat the disease all have serious drawbacks, but without treatment the disease is generally lethal.

    T. brucei spp. are unicellular parasites. In the course of their life cycle in the mammalian host and the fly, the parasites develop into different life-cycle stages to adapt to their different environments. In this process they undergo changes in their morphology, gene expression, metabolism and surface coat. Bloodstream form trypanosomes are covered by a VSG coat that protects them from lysis by serum components. When the parasites are transferred to the tsetse midgut following a blood meal on an infected host, they differentiate into procyclic forms. During this process, the parasites start to shed the VSG coat that protects them in the mammal. The parasites simultaneously start to express procyclin proteins which form their coat in the fly midgut. Trypanosomes without a VSG coat are killed immediately when they are exposed to blood.

  • Objective

    A recent publication presented twenty eight compounds that triggered the differentiation of bloodstream towards procyclic forms. All were trypanocidal in vitro. We tested four of these compounds for their trypanocidal efficacy in a mouse model of trypanosome infection.

  • Results & Discussion

    The four compounds DIP-02, DIP-03, DIP-07 and DIP-19 were initially selected based on their in vitro efficacy against T. brucei (IC50 values of 1.0 µg ml-1 for DIP-02; 0.30 µg ml-1 for DIP-03; 2.2 µg ml-1 for DIP-07; 0.80 µg ml-1 for DIP-19) and their in vitro activity in the GUS differentiation assay (GUS active at ≤ 2.5 µg/ml). The GUS differentiation assay used a transgenic line that expresses ß-glucuronidase under the control of a procyclin promoter. Mice were infected with T. b. rhodesiense one day before the start of treatment and the effect of the treatments on blood parasite load was assessed qualitatively by microscopic examination of tail blood. The dosing regimens are described in figure 1A. The group size was limited to two mice per compound. The doses used in the first experiment were 2×50 mg kg-1 i.p. at 2 h intervals for DIP-02, -07, -19 as we hypothesised that a short trigger might be sufficient to initiate the differentiation process (Fig. 1A, upper panel). At this dose, none of the compounds were active against trypanosomes. In addition, DIP-02 was toxic when administered at a total dose of 100 mg kg-1 i.p. to infected mice.

    In the second experiment with DIP-03, -07 and -19, we started with a loading dose of 150 mg kg-1 followed by further doses of 100 mg kg-1 10 h and 24 h later (Fig. 1A, middle panel). DIP-03 was toxic at this high dose; DIP-07 and DIP-19 were tolerated at this dosage scheme, but did not reduce the parasitaemic load in tail blood.

    In the third experiment, we tested DIP-03 at a loading dose of 50 mg kg-1 followed by four doses of 25 mg kg-1 spaced by intervals of 6 h (Fig. 1A, lower panel). Also with this dosing scheme we did not observe a significant parasite reduction in tail blood.

    To determine whether the lack of efficacy was due to a poor compound exposure, we performed “snapshot” pharmacokinetic (PK) studies (Fig. 1B). This follows a simplified protocol that requires fewer mice and resources than a full PK. Although less informative compared to a full PK study, it provides sufficient information to determine whether the PK properties are likely to be the reason for treatment failure, and can also provide data to design a better treatment regime. DIP-02 was excluded from the PK experiment due to the toxicity observed in the preliminary efficacy test. DIP-03 was tested at 50 mg kg-1 whereas DIP-07 and DIP-19 were administered at 150 mg kg-1 because the latter two compounds were tolerated at higher doses. Compounds were administered as a single i.p. dose and blood samples taken over a period of 8 h (Fig. 1B). Concentrations were measured in lithium heparin plasma samples analyzed by UPLC MS/MS as described in supplementary information. The results are summarized in supplementary table S2.

    DIP-03 showed the best PK profile among the three compounds tested, with better exposure and a long half-life leading to a plasma drug concentration of 1.1 µg ml-1 8 h after injection (Fig. 1B). The Cmax was reached 10 min after injection and the concentration was 5–fold higher than the IC50 of the compound. However, the quantification method for the plasma samples did not distinguish between protein-bound and -unbound compound fractions. Plasma protein binding (PPB) data determined at 1 µM in mouse plasma showed a high mean PPB of 94% (Fig. 1B and Suppl. Table S2). High PPB was confirmed by serum-shift assays: increase from 10% to 40% inactivated horse serum in the in vitro viability assay (48 h Alamar blue assay) led to an 8–fold increase of the IC50 value (p<0.006, two-tailed paired t-test). The high PPB of DIP-03 indicates that the concentration of unbound drug in the mouse blood was too low in the efficacy experiments (at a dose reaching the toxicity limit) to kill the parasites in infected mice. The high PPB was most likely also the reason for the long half-life of DIP-03, given that a low free drug concentration significantly reduces clearance in an in vivo system.

    The pharmacologically relevant distribution half-lives were short for DIP-07 and DIP-19 (Fig. 1B). Additionally, the overall exposure of DIP-07 was much too low depicted by a Cmax below the IC50 concentration of the compound. DIP-19 showed the shortest half-life but at the same time the highest Cmax value (8 µg ml-1) which was 10–fold higher than its IC50. However, with the short distribution half-life of DIP-19 in the plasma, dropping already after 30 min to 1.44 µg ml-1 that with a mean PPB of 70% resulted in a too low free drug concentration (IC50 = 0.8 µg ml-1 in the 40 h Alamar blue assay, Fig. 1B). Hence compound exposure of all three compounds administered by the i.p. route resulted in a too low free drug concentration that is too low to kill parasites in vivo.

  • Conclusions

    Exploiting the complex life cycle of trypanosomes is a novel approach to chemotherapy. The hit compounds tested in vivo in this study were identified originally by targeting a parasite-specific process, in a screen for compounds that trigger parasite differentiation, and not by a typical phenotypic killing assay. However, the new compounds were not efficacious in vivo.

    We evaluated three of the new compounds in a snapshot PK study and observed poor PK profiles with low exposure, short half-lives or, for DIP-03, high protein binding of 94% leading to insufficient free compound. As is often the case in drug discovery and development, a poor in vivo PK profile is a major obstacle for in vivo efficacy.

    The hit compounds DIP-02, DIP-03, DIP-07 and DIP-19 could still serve as tool compounds to study the molecular mechanisms of parasite differentiation, but all four compounds have a negative therapeutic window and thus are poor drug candidates. In all likelihood they are not good leads for a drug discovery program for HAT.

  • Limitations

    1. Drug solubility: A better formulation of the compounds could improve solubility and hence improve activity.

    2. We hypothesised that a short trigger is sufficient to initiate the differentiation process. Therefore, the treatment regimen was rather short and with frequent doses to achieve a high Cmax or high initial plasma levels that would trigger the process. However, this hypothesis has not been validated yet.

    3. The in vitro time to kill was short for the four compounds, suggesting that high and short drug exposure would be sufficient to kill the parasites. This might be different in vivo.

  • Methods


    The structures of the DIP-compound are shown in supplementary figure S1 and have originally been published by Wenzler et. al..

    DIP-02, MW 447.37 (MolPort, Riga, Latvia)

    DIP-03 = CASIN, MW 342.87 (MolPort, Riga, Latvia)

    DIP-07 = Desloratadine, a tricyclic H1-antihistamine, MW 310.83 (MolPort, Riga, Latvia)

    DIP-19, MW 439.42 (MolPort, Riga, Latvia)

    Carvedilol, diazepam and amodiaquine as internal standards (IS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland). See the Supplementary Information for details.


    Female NMRI mice (Charles River, France) that weighed between 20 and 25 g at the start of the experiment were used for the efficacy and snapshot PK studies.

    Efficacy in a T. brucei mouse model.

    Mice were infected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 104 T. b. rhodesiense STIB900 1 day prior to compound treatment. A control group was infected, but remained untreated. Experimental groups of 2 mice were treated with the test compounds and tail blood was sampled of each individual mouse for microscopic qualitative assessment of parasitaemia as depicted in figure 1A. Mice were euthanised if no clear reduction in parasitaemia was detected compared to the untreated controls. The reference drug pentamidine cures this model at 3×4 mg kg-1 or 4×1 mg kg-1 i.p.

    Snapshot PK experiment

    2 mice were used per compound; the samples were pooled for each timepoint. Baseline blood samples (50 µl) were taken from the tail of an uninfected mouse one the day prior to compound administration. Compounds were injected at doses of 150 or 50 mg kg-1 i.p., and blood samples were taken over a period of 8 h. DIP-03 and DIP-07 were sampled at 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 3 h and 8 h after the compounds were injected; DIP-19 at 10 min, 30 min, 2 h, 4 h and 8 h (Fig. 1B). Blood compound concentrations were measured by UPLC MS/MS, see supplementary information.

    Plasma Protein Binding

    Mouse plasma protein binding was assessed at Bienta, Ukraine. The assay was performed in ready-to-use 96-well dialysis units (HTD96b dialyzer). Each individual well unit consisted of 2 chambers separated by a vertically aligned dialysis membrane strip with molecular weight cut-offs (MWCO) from 12 to 14 kDa. The compounds were tested at 1 μM in mouse plasma (MPH07-0500). Verapamil was used as reference compound (data not shown).

  • Funding statement

    This work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through the Grand Challenges Explorations program, grant number 53289, and the Novartis Foundation for medical-biological Research, grant number 16B136.

  • Ethics statement

    All experiments with mice were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Swiss authorities for animal welfare. All protocols and procedures used in the current study were reviewed and approved by the local veterinary authorities of the Canton Basel-Stadt, Switzerland (Permit numbers 2813 and 2566).

  • References
  • 1
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum ipsum

    Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum

    Pharmacokinetic profiles reconcile in vitro and in vivo activities of novel trypanocidal compounds

    Affiliation listing not available.

    Peer-reviewed by 2 reviewers with median rating of 13.5/20. Review process was triple-blinded.

    Round 1 (13.5/20)
    Technical quality6
    Conceptual advance and Impact7

    General comment

    Results & Discussion
    Technical quality8
    Conceptual advance and Impact6

    General comment