Peer-reviewed by 2 reviewers with median rating of 14/20. Review process was triple-blinded.
Round 1 (14/20)
Round 2 (14/20)
Conceptual advance and Impact7.5
Very clear and thorough observation. Details on the analysis metrics would be important, as noted above.
More information about the similarity score calculation would be helpful. The measures computed by Sound Analysis Pro are not clear. How are percent similarity, sequential match and accuracy calculated?
Conceptual advance and Impact6
This is an interesting result and technically nice, except for the fact that we have little evidence of precisely what was actually lesioned. Since it's a negative result, we're left wondering if maybe the lesions just didn't quite involve enough of NCM (or the right subregions, since NCM has a complex internal anatomy).